diet

Climate 101: Eating for the planet Part 2: Land Use

Eating for the Planet Part 2: Land Use

by Climate Leader, David Gladson

How does what we eat contribute to climate change?  In our last article we looked at how converting plant food into animal food requires us to grow more food and increases the carbon emissions from farming activities.  Today we’ll look at how land use also contributes to climate change and how not eating meat can help.

Land Use:  The largest store of carbon on our planet is in our soils in the form of organic matter, and that organic matter is what gives our soils life.  Plants, animals, insects, and microbes work together in an coordinated symphony to turn sunlight into sugar and unlock the minerals we need from the dirt.  When left undisturbed, or managed well in regenerative agriculture, the soil is our number one ally in our fight to clean up the atmosphere.

The animals we eat eat a lot of food themselves, which increases the amount of land we need to farm.  Growing food to feed to animals doubles the amount of agricultural land we use. Conventional agriculture produces a lot of food per acre of land, but at a high cost to the environment.  It releases the soil carbon into the atmosphere, which is bad in and of itself. But this also reduces the land’s ability to grow crops for the next year. Farmers either rely on chemical fertilizers (which burn a lot of fossil fuels to produce), or they must convert new land into farmland, driving deforestation.  By eating meat and animals products in the quantities we do, we drive deforestation and carbon emissions.

It is possible to raise animals in ways that don’t contribute to environmental destruction.  For example, silvopasture is a farming technique that raises cattle in a forest environment.  When done right, the cattle can actually contribute to the forest storing more soil carbon.  But, we could not raise enough animals using these techniques to meet our current demands for meat.  Switching to regenerative agriculture would require us to reduce our meat consumption by over 90%. Either we all need to drastically reduce the amount of meat and animals products we consume, or we need a whole lot of people to go vegan.  

Raising animals to eat in conventional farms requires more farmland, driving deforestation.  Furthermore, conventional farming damages the soil, causing farmers to seek new farmland (and more deforestation) or to use large quantities of artificial fertilizers and pesticides.  

The simplest solution to this cycle is to consume less meat and animals products.  It is possible to raise a small amount of meat and dairy in ways that don’t contribute to climate change, but not anywhere near the quantities we currently consume.

In our next article, we’ll talk about how the waste products from animal agriculture further contribute to climate change.  Stay tuned!

Climate 101: Eating for The Planet Part 1: Food Conversion

Eating for the Planet Part 1: Food Conversion

by Climate Leader, David Gladson

So you’ve heard people say that you could stop eating meat to help the planet, and you are wondering, how does what I eat impact the atmosphere?  Great question. While you might at first think that a calorie is a calorie, it turns out that different kinds of foods have vastly different carbon emissions in their production.  Meat has one of the highest carbon footprints for three key reasons. We’ll look at the first one, Food Conversion, below.

Animals are not very efficient at turning plants into edible animal products. According to a recent National Geographic article, “For every 100 calories of grain we feed animals, we get only about 40 new calories of milk, 22 calories of eggs, 12 of chicken, 10 of pork, or 3 of beef.”

In more natural food system, animals would be eating things that humans can’t eat and adding food to the system.  Cows would be grazing grass in a field that was lying fallow, or chickens would be running around the barnyard catching bugs.  But that is not how our modern agriculture system works. More than 99% of the animals we eat are raised in some kind of Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation, or CAFO.  Packed tightly together in large sheds for maximum efficiency, the animals are fed a diet designed to fatten them as quickly as possible - a diet of perfectly edible corn and soy, with some agricultural waste products mixed in.  

“For every 100 calories of grain we feed animals, we get only about 40 new calories of milk, 22 calories of eggs, 12 of chicken, 10 of pork, or 3 of beef.” National Geographic

Most beef marketed as free-range still spends time in a CAFO.  The cow might graze for the first year, but then spend 6 months fattening up in a CAFO up before slaughter.  

By converting human edible grains into animal products, we increase the amount of food we need to grow and increase the emissions from farming .  And while many of us grew up believing that eating animals products is essential to human health, they are not. The experience of millions of vegetarians and vegans around the world proves that a balanced and healthy diet without meat is not only possible but easy.  

In our next two articles, we’ll look at two other key ways that eating meat contributes to climate change: Land Use and Waste Products.